POISONOUS CHILDHOOD VACCINES = MEDICAL MURDER!

 VACCINE INGREDIENTS:

Aborted human fetal DNA (human-diploid fibroblast cell cultures strain WI-38, MRC-5 human diploid cells), animal DNA (swine, bovine, chicken, etc.), fetal bovine and calf serum (cow/calf blood), human serum albumin (human blood), dog & monkey kidney cells, VERO cells (a continuous line of monkey kidney cells), African Green Monkey kidney (Vero) cells, Gelatine (bovine or porcine derived), Formaldehyde (cancer-causing chemical), Aluminium phosphate, aluminium hydroxyde, aluminium sulfate (brain damaging neurotoxins), Mercury (Thimerosal - neurotoxin linked to autism and neurological damage in children), SV40 (a cancer-causing monkey virus found in oral polio vaccines and human tumors; also linked to the HIV-AIDS virus), polysorbate 80 (used in pharmacology to open the brain-blood barrier; also used to embalm dead corpses), alcohols, anti-foaming agent, 2-phenoxyethanol (antifreeze), etc. (list not exhaustive) ☠️☠️☠️☠️

See following CDC link for a complete list of vaccine ingredients: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm

Does any SANE person believe that injecting multiple doses of poisonous cocktails of highly toxic chemical poisons, brain-damaging neurotoxins, cancer-causing viruses and chemicals, animal viruses, bacteria, blood, DNA, filth, etc. into fetuses, newborns, infants and children are required to purportedly protect them against infectious diseases (+50 doses of 14 vaccines by the age 6 in the US!) ??????? 🤔

The 2017 CDC (Centre for Disease CREATION and PROMOTION) vaccine schedule requires U.S. children from birth to age 6 to receive 50 doses of 14 vaccines! Infants in the US are exposed from birth to age 2, to 24 vaccine doses, combining 8-in-1 vaccines to be given to infants 2, 4, and 6 months in a single visit! Babies receive 36 vaccine doses before they are 18 months old! www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/49-Doses-PosterB.pdf

Injecting fetuses, newborns, infants and children with multiples doses of highly toxic and poisonous vaccine cocktails that contain both live and "inactivated" viruses, bacteria, animal DNA, blood and filth, brain-damaging neurotoxic aluminium and autism-causing ethyl mercury (thimerosal), cancer-causing formaldehyde and other poisons and filth to purportedly prevent infectious diseases - caused largely if not solely by environmental factors such as poor nutrition, unclean water, toxic environments, poor sanitation, poor hygiene, etc. - is INSANE and MEDICAL MURDER!!!!  

And vaccines undermine and destroy the immune system of fetuses, newborns, infants and children opening the floodgates to infectious and chronic diseases, leading to an endless vicious murderous cycle of vaccinations and infectious diseases...

Moreover, the immune system of fetuses, newborns, infants and children is too immature to fight off the cocktail of poisons and filth contained in vaccines; to use an analogy, it's like sending fetuses, newborns, infants and children to fight a real war on the battlefield with trained adult soldiers and weapons of war to train and prepare them to become soldiers!

When will the CRIMINAL MADNESS, MASS MURDER and VACCINE HOLOCAUST of fetuses,  newborns, infants and children end ??????????????????????????????????????????

Arya Vrilya :-(

#vaccines #CDC #VaccineHolocaust #NAZI #GAVI

CDC VACCINE SCHEDULE & VACCINES LACED WITH MERCURY (Thimerosal) LINKED TO SPIKE IN AUTISM

Exponential increase in autism rates in US children linked to CDC vaccine schedule 

In 1985, the autism prevalence rate in the US was 1 in 2,500; in 1995 it was 1 in 500; In 2014 it was 1 in 45! In children aged 3 to 17, the autism prevalence rate increased by 80% from 2011-2013! At this rate, it is predicted that 1 out of 2 children in the US will have autism by 2030!

A report by EPA scientists Timing of Increased Autism Disorder Cumulative Incidence analyzed the cumulative incidence of autistic disorder during a 10-year period (1987–1996) pinpointed a sharp “changepoint” year (1988) when the incidence of autism sharply increased. The “changepoint” year is concomitant with the year childhood vaccination schedules expanded.  
Source: http://ahrp.org/disconnect-between-evidence-cdc-claims-re-childhood-vaccination-schedule/


Mercury (thimerosal) contained in childhood vaccines has also been proven to cause autism. 

Scientific research and CDC internal documents on the toxicity of mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines reveal exposure to thimerosal during the first month of life increased the relative risk of autism by 7.6 (760%), 1.8 (180%) increased relative risk for a neurodevelopmental disorder; 2.1 (210%) relative risk for speech disorder; and 5-fold (500%) increased relative risk for a nonorganic sleep disorder. CDC also suppressed the original findings of another of its own studies that found a 340% (3.6) relative increased risk of autism for African American male babies following MMR vaccination in accordance with the CDC-recommended Childhood Vaccination Schedule.

The alarming and damning scientific evidence documents that infants exposed to vaccines laced with thimerosal during the first month of life are at alarmingly high increased the relative risk of serious harm. “The data on its toxicity (shows) it can cause neurologic and renal toxicity, including death," writes Dr. Richard Johnston, M.D., an immunologist and pediatrician from the University of Colorado.

Dr. Verstraeten also said: “what I will present to you is the study that nobody thought we should do.” The study categorized the cumulative effect of thimerosal-containing vaccines administered to infants after one month of life and assessed the subsequent risk of degenerative and developmental neurologic disorders, and renal disorders before the age of six. Dr. Verstraeten stated that ALL of these relative risks were statistically significant.
Source: http://ahrp.org/betrayal-of-public-trust-institutional-corruption-vaccine-safety-ratings-vaccine-science-falsified/

The alarming and damning evidence presented in this paper should be used to sue the industry and their criminal minions i.e., CDC, World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Bill Gates, Melinda Gates et al. for Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide.

Arya Vrilya

GMO's: PANACEA TO FIGHT WORLD HUNGER OR TROJAN HORSE ?

“If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”
~Thomas Jefferson, president of the USA.

THE REAL HEALTH, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC HAZARDS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS (GMO) AND THE (hidden) GEOPOLITICAL AGENDA AND OBJECTIVES OF THE US ADMINISTRATION AND THE BIOTECH COMPANIES...


"If the facts don't support the theory, change the facts..." Albert Einstein

Barrack Obama and the US administration, Bill Gates, Rockfeller, Kofi Annan, Monsanto and other agrochemical and biotech multinationals have been fraudulently telling the world that they are on a philanthropic mission to “fight hunger and poverty” in Africa and to "feed the world" in a context of rapid population growth and climate change. However, beyond the deceitful rhetoric and fraudulent claims made by the above self-proclaimed saviors of Africa and the world, the facts and scientific and empirical evidence reveal a different picture altogether.

Monsanto and the other “Big Five” agro-chemical and biotechnilogy companies ( Monsanto, Syngeta, Dow Agro Chemical, Dupont, Bayer, BASF ) and their minions, cronies and butlers falsely claim that their genetic “technology” will be able to “feed the world” and “fight global hunger and poverty” by increasing agricultural yields and reducing pesticides usage - through genetic manipulation of plant DNA (in other words by changing the essence of Life (DNA) and the Laws of Nature)– thus increasing global food production, while decreasing production costs.

However, the following recently published independent scientific reports – based on scientific facts and empirical evidence - clearly rebuke these fraudulent claims.

Do GMO’s REALLY increase yield…?

According to a recently published scientific report - Failure to Yield: Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops - written by Doug Gurian-Sherman
and published by the Union of Concerned Scientists in March 2009, the scientific and empirical evidence does not support that claim.

Doug Gurian-Sherman writes:

“For years the biotechnology industry has trumpeted that it will feed the world, promising that its genetically engineered crops will produce higher yields. That promise has proven to be empty. Despite 20 years of research and 13 years of commercialization, genetic engineering has failed to significantly increase U.S. crop yields.”

Failure to Yield is the first (independent) scientific report to closely evaluate the overall effect genetic engineering has had on crop yields in relation to other agricultural technologies. It reviewed two dozen academic studies of corn and soybeans, the two primary genetically engineered food and feed crops grown in the United States.

Based on those studies, the UCS report concluded that genetically engineering herbicide-tolerant (HT) soybeans and herbicide-tolerant corn has not increased yields. Insect-resistant (bt) corn, meanwhile, has improved yields only marginally. The increase in yields for both crops over the last 13 years, the report found, was largely due to traditional breeding or improvements in agricultural practices.

Failure to Yield makes a critical distinction between potential—or intrinsic—yield and operational yield, concepts that are often conflated by the industry and misunderstood by others. Intrinsic yield refers to a crop’s ultimate production potential under the best possible conditions. Operational yield refers to production levels after losses due to pests, drought and other environmental factors.

The study reviewed the intrinsic and operational yield achievements of the three most common genetically altered foods and feed crops in the United States: herbicide-tolerant soybeans, herbicide-tolerant corn, and insect-resistant corn (known as Bt corn, after the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, whose genes enable the corn to resist several kinds of insects).

Herbicide-tolerant soybeans, herbicide-tolerant corn, and Bt corn have failed to increase intrinsic yields, the report found. Herbicide-tolerant soybeans and herbicide-tolerant corn also have failed to increase operational yields, compared with conventional methods.

In addition to evaluating genetic engineering’s record, Failure to Yield suggest that it makes little sense to support genetic engineering at the expense of technologies that have proven to substantially increase yields, especially in many developing countries. In addition, recent studies have shown that organic and similar farming methods that minimize the use of pesticides and synthetic fertilizers can more than double crop yields at little cost to poor farmers in such developing regions as Sub-Saharan Africa.

The report concludes that genetic engineering is unlikely to play a significant role in increasing food production in the foreseeable future. The biotechnology industry has been promising better yields since the mid-1990s, but Failure to Yield documents that the industry has been carrying out gene field trials to increase yields for 20 years without significant results

“If we are going to make headway in combating hunger due to overpopulation and climate change, we will need to increase crop yields,” said Gurian-Sherman. “Traditional breeding outperforms genetic engineering hands down.”

The complete report can be downloaded/read at the following link:

http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/science_and_impacts/science/failure-to-yield.html

Moreover, another major U.S. study published in 2008 found that GM soya produced by Monsanto actually produces 10 per cent less food than its conventional equivalent, thus undermining the oft-repeated claim that the use of GM technology is essential to solve the growing world food crisis.

Carried out over a three-year period at the University of Kansas, the study confirmed the findings of researchers from the University of Nebraska, who had previously found that another GM soya produced by Monsanto generated 6 per cent less food than its closest conventional relative, and 11 per cent less than the best non-GM soya available.

source: http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/exposed-the-great-gm-crops-myth-812179.html

The findings of this study were echoed in a separate report, published by the UK’s Soil Association, which examined the latest available research on GM crop yields over the last ten years. In contrast to the widely trumpeted claims of GM companies that they have the answer to world hunger, the report showed that the yields of all major GM crop varieties in cultivation are lower than, or at best, equivalent to, yields from non-GM varieties.

source: http://www.soilassociation.org/web/sa/aweb.nsf/848d689047cb466780256a6b00298980/3cacfd251aab6d318025742700407f02!OpenDocument

Last but not least, a 2008 draft report produced by the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology project – an ambitious, 4-year, US$10-million undertaking involving 4,000 scientists and experts from around the world – raised still further serious concerns about the environmental, human health and economic impacts of GM crops. As well as stating that there is no evidence that GM crops increase yields, the report specifically warned that use of the technology in the developing world could concentrate "ownership of agricultural resources" in the hands of the companies involved and cause problems with patents. Significantly therefore, following the report’s failure to back GM as a tool to reduce poverty and hunger, the biotech companies Monsanto, Syngenta and BASF promptly withdrew from the project.

http://www.agassessment.org/docs/SR_Exec_Sum_280508_English.htm

Do GMO’s REALLY decrease pesticide usage…?

Monsanto and other chemical and biotech companies have also fraudulently been claiming that GMO’s decrease the usage of *pesticides ( * herbicides, insectides and other chemicals used in industrial agriculture),thereby increasing farmers’ income by decreasing production costs while reducing environmental and ecological pollution from agricultural chemical pesticides.

However, once again scientific and empirical evidence debunk that claim.

According to the following (independent) scientific report published in November 2009 - "Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops on Pesticide Use: The First Thirteen Years" – authored by Charles Benbrook, Ph.D., Chief Scientist at The Organic Center:

"GE crops are pushing pesticide use upward at a rapidly accelerating pace. Farmers applied 318 million more pounds of pesticides over the last 13 years as a result of planting GE seeds."

The report is based on official, U.S. Department of Agriculture pesticide use data to estimate the differences in the average pounds of pesticides applied on GE crop acres, compared to acres planted to conventional, non-GE varieties.

The basic finding is that compared to pesticide use in the absence of GE crops, farmers applied 318 million more pounds of pesticides over the last 13 years as a result of planting GE seeds. This difference represents an average increase of about 0.25 pound for each acre planted to a GE trait.
GE crops are pushing pesticide use upward at a rapidly accelerating pace. In 2008, GE crop acres required over 26% more pounds of pesticides per acre than acres planted to conventional varieties. The report projects that this trend will continue as a result of the rapid spread of glyphosate-resistant weeds.

link to the full report: http://www.organic-center.org/science.pest.php?action=view&report_id=159

Pesticide treadmill...

Moreover, according to a report published in 2009 by Friends of the Earth titled "Who benefits from GM crops", the widespread adoption of GM "Roundup Ready" crops combined with the emergence of glyphosate-resistant weeds has driven a more than 15-fold increase in the use of glyphosate on major field crops from 1994 to 2005. The trend continues. In 2006, the last year for which data is available, glyphosate use on soybeans jumped a substantial 28%, from 75,743 million lbs in 2005 to 96,725 million lbs in 2006.

More and more farmers are being told – by agronomists and by Monsanto - to combat glyphosate-resistant weeds by applying other chemicals, such as paraquat, diquat and atrazine, often in combination with higher rates of glyphosate. USDA pesticide data confirm this trend: rising glyphosate use even while use of other more toxic herbicides also increases, or at best remains constant.

The widespread adoption of Roundup Ready GM crops in the US has driven a more than 15-fold increase in the use of glyphosate on soybeans, maize and cotton from 1994 to 2005. In 2006, the last year for which data are available, glyphosate use on soybeans jumped by a substantial 28%.

Increasing glyphosate use has driven an epidemic of glyphosate-resistant weeds, which in turn has led to rising use of other herbicides to control them. For instance, the amount of 2,4-D (a component of Agent Orange) applied to U.S. soybeans more than doubled from 2002 to 2006. The use of atrazine (banned in the EU due to links to health problems) on corn/maize increased by 12% between 2002 and 2005.

Brazilian government authorities have documented an 80% increase in glyphosate use from 2000 to 2005, together with the rapid emergence of weeds that are resistant to the chemical. Use of glyphosate grew 79.6% during this period, much faster than the increase in area planted to Roundup Ready soya.

In Argentina, overall glyphosate use has more than tripled from 65.5 million litres in 1999/2000 to over 200 million litres in 2005/6.17 In 2007, agricultural experts reported that a glyphosate-resistant version of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halapense) was infesting over 120,000 ha of the country’s prime cropland. Johnsongrass, an extremely damaging perennial, is a monocot weed that is considered one of the worst weeds in the world, and resistance to glyphosate will make it all the more harder to control. The emergence of glyphosate-resistant Johnsongrass is directly attributable to the huge increase in glyphosate use associated with near total dependence on Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina.

The main recommendation to control resistant weeds is to use a cocktail of herbicides other than glyphosate, including more toxic weedkillers such as paraquat, diquat and triazine herbicides such as atrazine.18 It is estimated that an additional 25 million litres of herbicides will be needed each year to control resistant weeds, resulting in an increase in production costs of between $160 and $950 million per year.

source: Friends of the Earth report: "Who benefits from GM crops"

As Einstein rightly stated: " Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

Pest resistance to GM Bt crops

Moreover, pests are also developing resistance to GM Bt crops, forcing farmers to use more insecticides.

Steve Connor, Science Editor of the UK based Independent newspaper write:

"An insect pest that is supposed to be killed by a type of genetically modified cotton crop with an in-built toxin gene has developed resistance and is beginning to spread in parts of the United States, a scientific study has found.

It is believed to be the first documented example in the wild of an insect pest becoming resistant to this particular type of GM crop, which was thought to be immune from the problems that have plagued conventional pesticides. The bollworm moth is one of the most destructive pests of cotton crops. The resistant form of the moth's caterpillar was found in a dozen fields in the southern states of Mississippi and Arkansas between 2003 and 2006, when the surveys were conducted.

The GM cotton was developed by inserting a gene into the plant that is normally found in a bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The bacterial gene produces a protein toxin that is poisonous to certain insects, but normally harmless in other animals.

Bruce Tabashnik of the University of Arizona, who led the research team, said: "What we are seeing is evolution in action. This is the first documented case of field-evolved resistance to a Bt crop."

In the case of the GM cotton crop, the bollworm insect developed resistance because of the huge area of land in America and elsewhere where GM crops modified with Bt genes are now grown.This has generated one of the largest forces of natural selection for insect resistance that the world has ever known, according to the researchers, whose study will be published in the journal Nature Biotechnology.

Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/pest-evolves-resistance-to-gm-crops-779794.html

LATEST UPDATED NEWS (Decembre 2010)

Pests "thriving and reproducing" on Bt cotton fields in India and China

An article in the latest issue of the journal Current Science raises serious questions about the long-term viability of genetically-modified Bt cotton to actually do what it's intended to do, increase pest resistance. Scientists have found for the first time bollworms not only living and surviving on GM cotton, but having offspring that can complete their full lifecycle there.

Looking at two varieties of Bt cotton in commercial use, containing both single and double genes intended to be toxin to the bollworms, the scientists found that the pests were able to survive.

Report co-author Aralimarad Prabhuraj told Kolkata's The Telegraph:

"We saw virtually no differences between the biology of insect populations reared on the GM cotton and the non-GM cotton ... We have indeed seen a dramatic boost to India's cotton, but we had always anticipated that at some point in time, we'll encounter pests that can withstand the modified plants. No one knew when it would happen."

source: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/12/gm-cotton-fails-pests-thriving-when-they-should-be-dead.php

links to the scientific study:

Survival and reproduction of natural populations of Helicoverpa armigera on
Bt-cotton hybrids in Raichur, India

http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/10dec2010/1602.pdf

Bt cotton boosting pesticide use

GM WATCH, Tuesday, 16 February 2010

GM lobbyists have tried to paint Bt cotton in India as a massive success story that's cut insecticide use and boosted productivity. Now Keshav Kranthi, a leading Indian entomologist and acting director of India's Central Institute of Cotton Research (CICR)] has told the Indian government that the rapid adoption of GM cotton by farmers across the country has coincided with:

*the rise of hitherto unknown insect pests

*increased pesticide applications by farmers

*declining cotton productivity over the past three years

The picture of what's been happening in India emerging from the research of this pro-GM scientist, ties in with the findings of research in China (also undertaken by GM supporters) which showed that seven years after the commercialization of Bt cotton there, the expenditure on pesticides by Bt cotton farmers was more or less the same as for conventional (non-GM) growers, despite the extra expenditure the Bt farmers were making on GM seeds in order to reduce (supposedly) their need to spray.

In India the picture appears to be even worse with pesticide applications on Bt cotton significantly overtaking those on conventional cotton.

EXTRACT: Kranthi says 90 per cent of the current GM cotton hybrids appear susceptible to mealybugs and whiteflies. Insecticide use in cotton appears to have increased from Rs 640 crore [6,400,000 rupees] in 2006 to Rs 800 crore [8,000,000 rupees] in 2008, his report said.

http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11944:bt-cotton-boosting-pesticide-use

Scientific study by PRO-GMO scientists reveal exponential increase in secondary cotton pests pests and pesticide use/expenditure on Bt cotton fields in China
"Seven years after the initial commercialization of Bt cotton in China, we show that total pesticide expenditure for Bt cotton farmers in China is nearly equal to that of their conventional counterparts, about $101 per hectare. Bt farmers in 2004 on the average, have to spray pesticide 18.22 times, which are more than 3 times higher compared with 6 times pesticide spray in 1999.

Detailed information on pesticide expenditures reveals that, though Bt farmers saved 46% Bollworm pesticide relative to non-Bt farmers, they spend 40% more on pesticides designed to kill an emerging secondary pest. These secondary pests (one example is Mirid) was rarely found in the field prior to the adoption of Bt cotton, presumably kept in check by bollworm populations and regular pesticide spraying. The extra expenditure needed to control secondary pests nearly offsets the savings on primary pesticide frequently cited in the current literature

link to the study:

Tarnishing Silver Bullets: Bt Technology Adoption, Bounded Rationality and the Outbreak of Secondary Pest Infestations in China (Shenghui Wang, David Just, Jul-2006)

http://www.grain.org/btcotton/?id=374

http://www.grain.org/research_files/SWang_tarnished.pdf

Thus, it is crystal clear from both the scientifc and empirical evidence and conclusion from the above (independent) scientific reports that genetic “technology” applied in agriculture (GMO’s) can neither increase crop yields nor reduce pesticides usage, thus directly contradicting the fraudulent claims made by Monsanto and the other agrochemical & biotechnology companies, that GMO’s can “feed the world” by increasing crop yields and reducing pesticides usage, thus increasing both food production and farmers’ revenue while preserving the soil and environment from chemical pollution.

HUMAN HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF GMO’s

"Let food be thy medicine and let thy medicine be thy food." Hippocrates

Monsanto's Round-Up-Ready herbicide “ causes birth defects, malformations, miscarriages, hormonal problems, reproductive problems, and different types of cancers.”

An (independent) scientific study written by an Argentine scientist earlier this year reports that glyphosate, patented by Monsanto under the name "Round Up "causes birth defects when applied in doses much lower than what is commonly used in soy fields.”

The study was directed by a leading embryologist, Dr. Andres Carrasco, a professor and researcher at the University of Buenos Aires.

The study reports that glyphosate causes birth defects. Frog embryos injected with glyphosate developed obvious defects which would compromise their ability to live in their normal habitats. The frog embryos grown in petri dishes in the photos looked like something from a futuristic horror film, creatures with visible defects—one eye the size of the head, spinal cord deformations, and kidneys that are not fully developed.

"We injected the amphibian embryo cells with glyphosate diluted to a concentration 1,500 times than what is used commercially and we allowed the amphibians to grow in strictly controlled conditions." "On the side where the contaminated cell was injected you can see defects in the eye and defects in the cartilage."
For the past 15 months, Dr. Carrasco's research team documented embryos' reactions to glyphosate. Embryological study is based on the premise that all vertebrate animals share a common design during the development stages. This accepted scientific premise means that the study indicates human embryonic cells exposed to glyphosate, even in low doses, would also suffer from defects.

"When a field is fumigated by an airplane, it's difficult to measure how much glysophate remains in the body," says Dr. Carrasco. "When you inject the embryonic cell with glysophate, you know exactly how much glysophate you are putting into the cell and you have a strict control."

Furthermore, one need not be a scientist to realize what effect eating herbicides-sprayed crops ( HT corn, soya, etc.) and insecticide producing food crops( bt crops that have genetically “engineered” to produce a toxin) will have on animal and human health…

Inhabitants living in proximity of GM soya fields in Argentina have reported that "We have had children born with only two thumbs and no fingers, malformed kidneys, children with six fingers. We have had babies born without an anus, or with malformations in the intestines."
Source: http://americas.irc-online.org/am/6254

Roundup/glyphosate is the top selling herbicide in the world and is widely used on soy crops in Argentina and other food crops (i.e. GM corn, soya, canola, cotton, etc.) in more than 160 countries & used for both livestock feed ( which are then eaten by humans...) and direct human consumption (note: almost all industrially-processed foods contains at least one or more of GMO ingredients.)

GM Soy: Sustainable? Responsible? - New report (2010)

"The cultivation of GM RR soy endangers human and animal health, increases herbicide use, damages the environment, reduces biodiversity, and has negative impacts on rural populations. The monopolistic control by agribusiness companies over GM RR soy technology and production endangers markets, compromises the economic viability of farming, and threatens food security."

A group of international scientists have recently ( sept 2010) released a report detailing health and environmental hazards from the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) Roundup Ready soy and the use of glyphosate (Roundup®) herbicide.

The report, GM Soy: Sustainable? Responsible?,[1] highlights new research by Argentine government scientist, Professor Andrés Carrasco,[2] which found that glyphosate causes malformations in frog and chicken embryos at doses far lower than those used in agricultural spraying.

“The findings in the lab are compatible with malformations observed in humans exposed to glyphosate during pregnancy,” said Carrasco.

Carrasco, director of the Laboratory of Molecular Embryology, University of Buenos Aires Medical School and lead researcher of the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Argentina, is a co-author of the new report. The report is released with testimonies of Argentine villagers whose lives have been radically disrupted by the cultivation of GM soy.[3]

In Argentina and Paraguay, doctors and residents living in GM soy producing areas have reported serious health effects from glyphosate spraying, including high rates of birth defects as well as infertility, stillbirths, miscarriages, and cancers. Scientific studies collected in the new report confirm links between exposure to glyphosate and premature births, miscarriages, cancer, and damage to DNA and reproductive organ cells.

Residents have also reported environmental damage from glyphosate, including damage to food crops and streams strewn with dead fish. These accounts are backed by studies in the report that show glyphosate is toxic to the environment.
Link to the full report:

http://www.gmwatch.eu/images/pdf/gmsoy_sust_respons_full_eng_v14.pdf

OTHER SCIENTIFIC & MEDICAL REPORTS CONFIRMING THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF GMO CONSUMPTION ON ANIMAL & HUMAN HEALTH

Monsanto's Round-Up-Ready herbicide causes cells to die in human embryo...
The study in Argentina is not the only research concluding that Monsanto’s Roundup and other herbicides containing glyphosate as their active ingredient is harmful to human health. Gilles-Eric Seralini, professor at the University of Caen and specialist in molecular biology, led a study that concluded the herbicides in the Round Up Ready package causes cells to die in human embryos.
"Even in doses diluted a thousand times, the herbicide could cause malformations, miscarriages, hormonal problems, reproductive problems, and different types of cancers," said Dr. Seralini

Below is the official press-release statement from the Committee for Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (CRIIGEN) www.criigen.org

Press Release CRIIGEN - May 2007

Effects of the herbicide Roundup on human embryonic cells

Professor Séralini’s group (1), in the University of Caen, France, just published a study on the previously unknown toxic effects of Roundup on human embryonic cells.
Roundup is the major herbicide in use worldwide, including on GMOs for food and
feed. The embryonic cells are from a line cultivated in the laboratory and their use does not necessitate embryo destruction. The group wanted to confirm and detail the understanding of the effects already observed on placental cells, as published by Séralini’s group in 2005.

Following comparison, it appears that embryonic cells are far more sensitive. The
deleterious results of Roundup are noticed at very week doses (the product sold in stores is diluted up to 10,000 times). Sensitivity is confirmed in particular for the disruption of sexual hormones at non toxic levels, especially on fresh placental extracts. The maximal active dilutions correspond to less than the residues in discussion to be authorized in GMO feed in the United States.

It is evidenced that the herbicide Roundup, as sold on the market, is far more toxic than the product which is known and approved to be its active ingredient: glyphosate. The gaps in European legislation to study the effects of mixtures and hormonal disruptions are underlined.

This work may be of help in better understating the problems of miscarriages, premature births or sexual malformations of babies, in particular in agricultural workers families.

The paper published on line first (1) on the website of the journal « Archives of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology » directed by Dr. Doerge from the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) in USA, will appear in the July 2007 issue.

Contact : Pr Gilles-Eric Séralini, Biochemistry, Institute of Biology, University of Caen,
Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen, France. Telephone: 33(0)2-31-56-56-84. Fax: 33(0)2-31-56-53-20. Corinne Lepage President of CRIIGEN. E-mail: criigen@unicaen.fr.

(1) Time and Dose-Dependent Effects of Roundup on Human Embryonic and Placental Cells
by Nora Benachour, Herbert Sipahutar, Safa Moslemi, Céline Gasnier, Carine Travert, Gilles-Eric Séralini.

(http://www.springerlink.com/content/d13171q7k863l446/fulltext.html)

The complete report can be downloaded at the following link:

http://www.criigen.org/content/view/185/85/

MONSANTO'S GM CORN LINKED TO ORGAN DAMAGE, reveals scientific study

In what is being described as the first ever and most comprehensive study of the effects of genetically modified foods on mammalian health, researchers have linked organ damage with consumption of Monsanto’s GM maize.

Three varieties of Monsanto’s GM corn – Mon 863, insecticide-producing Mon 810, and Roundup® herbicide-absorbing NK 603 – were approved for consumption by US, European and several other national food safety authorities. The data used for this approval, ironically, is the same data that independent researchers studied to make the organ damage link.

The Committee of Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (CRIIGEN) and Universities of Caen and Rouen obtained Monsanto’s confidential raw data of its 2002 feeding trials on rats after a European court made it public in 2005.

The data “clearly underlines adverse impacts on kidneys and liver, the dietary detoxifying organs, as well as different levels of damages to heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system,” reported Gilles-Eric Séralini, a molecular biologist at the University of Caen.

Although different levels of adverse impact on vital organs were noticed between the three GMOs, the 2009 research shows specific effects associated with consumption of each, differentiated by sex and dose.

Their December 2009 study appears in the International Journal of Biological Sciences (IJBS). This latest study conforms with a 2007 analysis by CRIIGEN on Mon 863, published in Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, using the same data.

link to the study: http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm#headingA11

The American Academy of Environmental Medicine warns of adverse health effect of GM foods on human health

Furthermore, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has recently issued and published an alarming statement which states that “ there is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects.

The strength of association and consistency between GM foods and disease is confirmed in several animal studies.” Specificity of the association of GM foods and specific disease processes is also supported. Also, because of the mounting data, it is biologically plausible for Genetically Modified Foods to cause adverse health effects in humans.
Excerpts from the AAEM statement:

“Safety assessment of GM foods has been based on the idea of "substantial equivalence" such that "if a new food is found to be substantially equivalent in composition and nutritional characteristics to an existing food, it can be regarded as safe as the conventional food."

However, several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food consumption including infertility, immune dysregulation, accelerated aging, dysregulation of genes associated with cholesterol synthesis, insulin regulation, cell signaling, and protein formation, and changes in the liver, kidney, spleen and gastrointestinal system.”

There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects. There is causation as defined by Hill's Criteria in the areas of strength of association, consistency, specificity, biological gradient, and biological plausibility. The strength of association and consistency between GM foods and disease is confirmed in several animal studies.

Specificity of the association of GM foods and specific disease processes is also supported. Multiple animal studies show significant immune dysregulation, including upregulation of cytokines associated with asthma, allergy, and inflammation. Animal studies also show altered structure and function of the liver, including altered lipid and carbohydrate metabolism as well as cellular changes that could lead to accelerated aging and possibly lead to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS. Changes in the kidney, pancreas and spleen have also been documented.
A recent 2008 study links GM corn with infertility, showing a significant decrease in offspring over time and significantly lower litter weight in mice fed GM corn. This study also found that over 400 genes were found to be expressed differently in the mice fed GM corn. These are genes known to control protein synthesis and modification, cell signaling, cholesterol synthesis, and insulin regulation. Studies also show intestinal damage in animals fed GM foods, including proliferative cell growth and disruption of the intestinal immune system."
Precautionary Principle

" Therefore, because GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health and are without benefit, the AAEM believes that it is imperative to adopt the precautionary principle, which is one of the main regulatory tools of the European Union environmental and health policy and serves as a foundation for several international agreements. The most commonly used definition is from the 1992 Rio Declaration that states: "In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation."

Another often used definition originated from an environmental meeting in the United States in 1998 stating: "When an activity raises threats to the environment or human health, precautionary measures should be taken, even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. In this context, the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof (of the safety of the activity)."

With the precautionary principle in mind, because GM foods have not been properly tested for human consumption, and because there is ample evidence of probable harm, the AAEM asks:

Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community, and the public to avoid GM foods when possible and provide educational materials concerning GM foods and health risks.

Physicians to consider the possible role of GM foods in the disease processes of the patients they treat and to document any changes in patient health when changing from GM food to non-GM food.

Our members, the medical community, and the independent scientific community to gather case studies potentially related to GM food consumption and health effects, begin epidemiological research to investigate the role of GM foods on human health, and conduct safe methods of determining the effect of GM foods on human health.

For a moratorium on GM food, implementation of immediate long term independent safety testing, and labeling of GM foods, which is necessary for the health and safety of consumers.
(This statement was reviewed and approved by the Executive Committee of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine on May 8, 2009.)

Submitted by Amy Dean, D.O. and Jennifer Armstrong, M.D.

Complete/official statement available at:

http://www.aaemonline.org/gmopost.html

And the Truth Shall...get you fired!

The first ever (independent) scientific study to look into the effects of GMO food consumption on human health was conducted by the world's leading lectins and plant genetic modification expert, UK-based Arpad Pusztai from the prestigious Scotland's Rowett Research Institute.

Arpad Pusztai - the world's foremost expert in the field - became alarmed by his findings, and was subsequently vilified and fired from his research position at Scotland's Rowett Research Institute for publishing "industry-unfriendly" data ( i.e the Truth) he was commissioned to produce on the safety of GMO foods. His results were startling and considered the implications for humans eating genetically engineered foods.

Rats fed GMO potatoes had smaller livers, hearts, testicles and brains, damaged immune systems, and showed structural changes in their white blood cells making them more vulnerable to infection and disease compared to other rats fed non-GMO potatoes. It got worse. Thymus and spleen damage showed up; enlarged tissues, including the pancreas and intestines; and there were cases of liver atrophy as well as significant proliferation of stomach and intestines cells that could be a sign of greater future risk of cancer. Equally alarming - this all happened after 10 days of testing, and the changes persisted after 110 days that's the human equivalent of 10 years.

Safety of meat, dairy products and eggs from GM-fed livestock

Jeffrey Smith, Executive Director of the Institute for Responsible Technology makes the following observations in an article written in the Huffington post on the observed detrimental health effects of GM foods on animals and humans.

“Dairy cows are usually fed GM feed and sometimes injected with GM bovine growth hormone. Although no studies have looked at the impact of eating meat or milk from GM-fed animals, secret FDA documents(1) made public from a lawsuit revealed that their Center for Veterinary Medicine was very concerned that toxins from GM foods might bioaccumulate in the livestock. If so, their milk and meat may be even more dangerous than the GM plants.

(1) http://biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/08/OGG1V.GIF

Studies on the impact of bovine growth hormone on the cows' milk are less ambiguous.(2) The dairy products from treated cows contain higher amounts of puss, antibiotics, bovine growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). The last on the list is considered most dangerous. IGF-1 is linked to a much higher risk of cancer, and according to one study, may also be responsible for the high rates of fraternal twins born in the US.

2)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-smith/governor-sebelius-must-ve_b_183838.html

Digestive disorders
According to GMO safety expert Arpad Pusztai, PhD, the digestive tract is the first and largest point of contact with GM foods and can reveal reactions to various toxins. Lab animals fed GM feed developed lesions in the stomach, damage intestines, and abnormal and proliferative cell growth in the walls of the stomach and intestines.

Toxic intestinal bacteria

The beneficial bacteria living inside our digestive tract is used for digestion and immunity. Excessive herbicide residues on herbicide-tolerant GM crops may kill beneficial gut flora. More importantly, the only published human feeding experiment revealed that the genetic material inserted into GM soy transfers into bacteria living inside our intestines and continues to function. This means that long after we stop eating GM foods, we may still have dangerous GM proteins continuously produced inside us. Consider, for example, if the gene that creates Bt-toxin in GM corn were also to transfer. It might turn our intestinal bacteria into living pesticide factories.

FDA scientists were also quite concerned about the possibility of inserted genes spontaneously transferring into the DNA of bacteria inside our digestive tract. Although the biotech industry confidently asserted that gene transfer from GM foods was not possible, the only human feeding study on GM foods later proved that it does take place. The genetic material in soybeans that make them herbicide tolerant transferred into the DNA of human gut bacteria and continued to function. That means that long after we stop eating a GM crop, its foreign GM proteins may be produced inside our intestines. It is also possible that the foreign genes might end up inside our own DNA, within the cells of our own organs and tissues.

Compromised immune system
Virtually every animal feeding study that looked for immune changes from GMOs found them. GM-fed animals had a sluggish immune responses, damaged organs associated with immunity, altered parameters in the blood, and dangerous inflammatory and immune reactions.
Allergies

No tests can guarantee that a GMO will not cause allergies. Although the World Health Organization recommends a screening protocol, GM soy and corn fail those tests--because their GM proteins have properties of known allergens.

It is noteworthy that children with autism are often allergic to corn and soy. Both are genetically engineered. Many are also allergic to dairy.

Soon after GM soy was introduced in the UK, soy allergies skyrocketed by 50 percent. A skin prick allergy test verified that some people react to GM soy, but not to natural soy. GM soy contains as much as 7-times the amount of a known soy allergen. Both GM soy and corn contain at least one new unexpected allergen, not found in natural crops.

The biotech industry claims that Bt-toxin is harmless to humans and mammals because the natural bacteria version has been used as a spray by farmers for years. In reality, hundreds of people exposed to natural Bt spray had allergic and flu-like symptoms. Now, farm workers throughout India are getting those same symptoms from handling Bt cotton. Likewise, mice fed natural Bt had powerful immune responses; now mice and rats fed Bt corn also show immune responses.

GMOs may make you allergic to non-GM foods

Since GMOs were introduced in the US, food allergies have become a huge problem, especially for kids. Some of the foods that trigger reactions, however, are not genetically engineered. But studies show how GM foods might create sensitivity to other foods, and may in fact be contributing to this national epidemic.

GM soy, for example, drastically reduces digestive enzymes in mice. If our ability to breakdown proteins was impaired, we could become allergic to a wide variety of foods.

Mice fed Bt-toxin not only reacted to the Bt itself, they started having immune reactions to foods that were formerly harmless. The Bt-toxin in the corn we eat may have a similar impact. Mice fed experimental GM peas also started reacting to a range of other "safe" foods. The allergen responsible for this reaction may be found in GM foods on our supermarket shelves.

GMOs and liver problems
The liver is a primary detoxifier. Its condition can indicate if there are toxins in our food. Mice and rats fed GM feed had profound changes in their livers. In some cases, livers were smaller and partially atrophied. Some were significantly heavier, possibly inflamed. And certain cellular changes indicated a toxic insult from the GM diet.

Reproductive problems and infant mortality
Both male and female animals showed horrific problems when fed GM soy. More than half the babies of mother rats fed GM soy died within three weeks, compared to 10 percent of the non-GM soy controls. The GM babies were also considerably smaller, and were unable to conceive in a subsequent study. Male rats and mice fed GM soy had changed testicles, including altered young sperm cells in the mice. And when both mouse parents ate GM soy, the DNA of their embryos functioned differently. GM corn also had an impact. The longer mice were fed the corn, the fewer babies they had and the smaller their babies were.
Livestock sterility, disease, and death
Many of the problems seen in laboratories are also reported by farmers and investigators in the field. Thousands of sheep, buffalo, and goats in India died after grazing on Bt cotton plants after harvest. Others suffered poor health and serious reproductive problems.

Farmers in Europe and Asia say that cows, water buffaloes, chickens, and horses died from eating Bt corn varieties. About two dozen US farmers report that GM corn varieties caused widespread sterility in pigs or cows.

source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-smith/lymeautism-group-blasts-g_b_268580.html

In June, a report published by the US-based Institute for Responsible Technology drew together the findings from more than 100 research papers. Entitled "State-of-the-Science on the Health Risks of GM Foods," it described the conflict of interest among regulators that allowed GM foods on the market; the wide range of adverse findings from animal feeding studies such as higher death rates, organ damage, reproductive failures, and infant mortality; reports by farmers of thousands of sick, sterile, and dead livestock; toxic and allergic properties of GM foods; numerous scientific assumptions used as the basis for safety claims that have since proven false; inadequate regulatory oversight; biased industry safety studies; manipulation of public opinion; and the mistreatment of scientists critical of the technology. In sharp contrast to the claims of those who disingenuously allege that there is a scientific consensus in favour of GM crops, the report’s contents prove that there are in fact a large number of research scientists who have serious concerns regarding the safety of these products.

GENETIC ENGINEERING PROCESS FLAWED & DANGEROUS

Furthermore, Jeffrey Smith states that in addition to the detrimental health effects of GM foods consumption for humans & animals, the process of genetic engineering itself creates unpredicted alterations, irrespective of which gene is transferred. The gene insertion process, for example, is accomplished by either shooting genes from a “gene gun” into a plate of cells, or using bacteria to infect the cell with foreign DNA. Both create mutations in and around the insertion site and elsewhere.11 The “transformed” cell is then cloned into a plant through a process called tissue culture, which results in additional hundreds or thousands of mutations throughout the plants’ genome. In the end, the GM plant’s DNA can be a staggering 2‐4% different from its natural parent.12 Native genes can be mutated, deleted, or permanently turned on or off. In addition, the insertion process causes holistic and not‐well‐understood changes among large numbers of native genes. One study revealed that up to 5% of the natural genes altered their levels of protein expression as a result of a single insertion.

The Royal Society of Canada acknowledged that “the default prediction” for GM crops would include “a range of collateral changes in expression of other genes, changes in the pattern of proteins produced and/or changes in metabolic activities.”13 Although the FDA scientists evaluating GMOs in 1992 were unaware of the extent to which GM DNA is damaged or changed, they too described the potential consequences. They reported, “The possibility of unexpected, accidental changes in genetically engineered plants” might produce “unexpected high concentrations of plant toxicants.”14 GM crops, they said, might have “increased levels of known naturally occurring toxins,” and the “appearance of new, not previously identified” toxins.15 The same mechanism can also produce allergens, carcinogens, or substances that inhibit assimilation of nutrients.

The complete report can be downloaded & read at the following link:( highly recommended)

http://www.seedsofdeception.com/DocumentFiles/145.pdf

Similarly, in an article published in the New York Times in july 2007 titled "Change to gene theory raises new challenges for biotech", Denise Caruso writes:

"The $73.5 billion global biotech business may soon have to grapple with a discovery that calls into question the scientific principles on which it was founded.

Last month, a consortium of scientists published findings that challenge the traditional view of the way genes function. The exhaustive, four-year effort was organized by the United States National Human Genome Research Institute and carried out by 35 groups from 80 organizations around the world. To their surprise, researchers found that the human genome might not be a "tidy collection of independent genes" after all, with each sequence of DNA linked to a single function, like a predisposition to diabetes or heart disease.

Instead, genes appear to operate in a complex network, and interact and overlap with one another and with other components in ways not yet fully understood. According to the institute, these findings will challenge scientists "to rethink some long-held views about what genes are and what they do."

Biologists have recorded these network effects for many years in other organisms. But in the world of science, discoveries often do not become part of mainstream thought until they are linked to humans.

With that link now in place, the report is likely to have repercussions far beyond the laboratory. The presumption that genes operate independently has been institutionalized since 1976, when the first biotech company was founded. In fact, it is the economic and regulatory foundation on which the entire biotechnology industry is built.

The principle that gave rise to the biotech industry promised benefits that were equally compelling. Known as the Central Dogma of molecular biology, it stated that each gene in living organisms, from humans to bacteria, carries the information needed to construct one protein. The scientists who invented recombinant DNA in 1973 built their innovation on this mechanistic, "one gene, one protein" principle.
Because donor genes could be associated with specific functions, with discrete properties and clear boundaries, scientists then believed that a gene from any organism could fit neatly and predictably into a larger design - one that products and companies could be built around, and that could be protected by intellectual-property laws.

This presumption, now disputed, is what one molecular biologist calls "the industrial gene."
source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/03/business/worldbusiness/03iht-biotech.4.6471136.html?_r=1

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF GMO’S

Monsanto’s Roundup: “Biodegrable & Environmentally friendly…?
Supreme Court of France finds Monsanto guilty of fraud.
Monsanto fraudulently claimed that its herbicide (Roundup) was “biodegrable” and it “left the soil clean…”

However, the Supreme Court of France has ruled that Monsanto had lied about the safety of its best-selling weed-killer, Roundup. The court confirmed an earlier judgment in 2009 that Monsanto had falsely advertised its herbicide as "biodegradable" and claimed it "left the soil clean."

French environmental groups had brought the case in 2001 on the basis that glyphosate, Roundup's main ingredient, is classed as "dangerous for the environment" by the European Union.

In the latest ruling, France's Supreme Court upheld two earlier convictions against Monsanto by the Lyon criminal court in 2007, and the Lyon court of appeal in 2008, the AFP news agency reports.

Genetic pollution & environmental destruction

Superweeds

Since 2004, “super weeds” (pigweed, horse weed, ragweed, etc. ) have developed a resistance to glyphosate/Roundup and have rapidly spread across Sun Belt states and other grain basket states of the US (Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Arkansas, Tennessee, Kentucky and Missouri).

Today, 100,000 acres in Georgia are severely infested with pigweed and 29 counties have now confirmed resistance to glyphosate, according to weed specialist Stanley Culpepper from the University of Georgia. In 2007, 10,000 acres of land were abandoned in Macon country, the epicenter of the super weed explosion, North Carolina State University’s Alan York told local media.

Pesticides treadmill…

Over time, weeds develop resistance to herbicides, explains Javier Souza Casadinho, professor at the University of Buenos Aires and regional coordinator of the Latin American Action Network for Alternative Pesticides. "Producers must use more applications, and in higher doses with higher toxicity—the application has gone from three liters in 1999 to the current dose of 12 liters, per hectare," says Souza.

According to the UK-based Soil Association, which campaigns for and certifies organic food, Monsanto was well aware of the risk of super weeds as early as 2001 and took out a patent on mixtures of glyphosate and herbicide targeting glyphosate-resistant weeds.

“The patent will enable the company to profit from a problem that its products had created in the first place,” says a 2002 Soil Association report.

Monsanto’s technical development manager, Rick Cole, said he believed super weeds were manageable. “The problem of weeds that have developed a resistance to Roundup crops is real and [Monsanto] doesn’t deny that, however the problem is manageable,” he said.

“Solution” offered by Monsanto: Use more toxic pesticides…
Indeed, according to Monsanto press releases, company sales representatives are encouraging farmers to mix glyphosate and older herbicides such as 2,4-D, a herbicide which was banned in Sweden, Denmark and Norway over its links to cancer, reproductive harm and mental impairment to combat weeds resistance to glyphosate, the main active ingredient in Roundup. 2,4-D is also well-known for being a component of Agent Orange, a toxic herbicide which was used in chemical warfare in Vietnam in the 1960s.

As Einstein rightly said:

"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results"

It is clear that the widespread and growing weed-resistance to Roundup seriously threatens food security in both the US and around the world (US is the largest exporter of grain). Moreover the “solution” offered by Monsanto to combat weed-resistance to Roundup ( using more toxic pesticides) further pollutes and endangers both the environment & the entire ecosystem as well as human health, thus directly contradicting Monsanto’s official stated objective mission to“ feed the world" with abundant, healthy & nutrutious food while preserving the environment...

GMO’S EFFECT ON THE SOIL
Bt cotton kills the soil as well as farmers…
Over 200,000 cotton farmers have committed suicide in India since 2003 as a result of planting Monsanto's GM Bt cotton. Monsanto's false promises and fraudulent claims of higher yields, lower insecticide use and costs and higher revenue never materialized; instead, farmers were debt-trapped, lost their lands and committed suicide out of desperation...

Bt cotton kills the soil...
A recent scientific study carried out by Navdanya, compared the soil of fields where Bt-cotton had been planted for 3 years with adjoining fields with non GMO cotton or other crops. The region covered included Nagpur, Amravati and Wardha of Vidharbha which accounts for highest GMO cotton planting in India, and the highest rate of farmers suicides (4000 per year).

In 3 years, the study found that Bt-cotton has reduced the population of Actinomycetes by 17%. Actinomycetes are vital for breaking down cellulose and creating humus. Bacteria were reduced by 14%. The total microbial biomass was reduced by 8.9%.

Vital soil beneficial enzymes which make nutrients available to plants have also been drastically reduced. Acid Phosphatase which contributes to uptake of phosphates was reduced by 26.6%. Nitrogenase enzymes which help fix nitrogen were reduced by 22.6%.

At this rate, in a decade of planting with GM cotton, or any GM crop with Bt genes in it, could lead to total destruction of soil organisms, leaving dead soil unable to produce food, concludes the report..
How does Monsanto plan to "feed the world" by killing farmers and the soil...?

The ISAAA in its recent release has stated that there are 7.6 mha of Bt-cotton in India. This means 7.6 mha of dying soils.

The impact of GMO’s on soil organisms is not commonly studied. This is a vital lacunae because Bt toxin crops such as Mon 810 corn or Bt-cotton or Bt Brinjal have serious impact on beneficial soil organisms.

The Navdanya study the first that has looked at the long term impact of Bt cotton on soil organisms is a wake up to regulators worldwide. It also shows that the claims of the Biotechnology industry about the safety of GM crops are false.

To obtain a copy of the report, please contact -

Navdanya A-60, Hauz Khas New Delhi - 110 016
Phone : 91-11-26535422 / 26532124
Email : vandana@vandanashiva.com Website : www.navdanya.org

Chemical pollution & deforestation

As we have seen above, Monsanto fraudulently claimed that genetic engineering will preserve the environment by decreasing the amount of pesticides used in GMO agriculture. Scientific evidence provided above clearly contradicts and debunks this fraudulent claim.

Furthermore, millions of hectares of forests and other natural landscapes are being savagely and irreversibly destroyed at an alarming rate every day around the world to plant Genetically modified crops to feed cattle and other livestock for consumption in affluent countries and for agrofuel production.

"Soy cultivation has already resulted in the deforestation of 21 million hectares of forests in Brazil, 14 million hectares in Argentina, two million hectares in Paraguay and 600,000 hectares in Bolivia.

Since 1995, total land dedicated to soybean production in Brazil has increased 3.2 percent per year (320,000 hectares per year). Soybean—along with sugar cane—currently occupies the largest area of any crop in Brazil at 21 percent of the total cultivated land. The total land used for soybean cultivation has increased by a
factor of 57 since 1961, and the volume of production has multiplied 138 times. Fifty-five percent of the soy crop, or 11.4 million hectares, is genetically modified. In Paraguay, soybeans occupy more than 25 percent of all agricultural land. Extensive land clearing has accompanied this expansion; for example; much of Paraguay’s Atlantic forest has been cleared, in part for the soy
production that comprises 29% of the country’s agricultural land use."1

1. source: Agrofuels in the Americas, Edited by Richard Jonasse, PhD.
Copyright © 2009 Institute for Food and Development Policy.

Thus, GMO’s are directly & irreversibly destroying the environment and killing the soil – through chemical pollution, deforestation, etc - contrary to the fraudulent claims made by Monsanto and other biotech companies that GMO’s help preserve the environment.

Social consequences

Moreover, small holders’ farmers are often driven off their lands by biotech companies, thereby worsening global hunger and poverty.

As Marie Trigona writes:

“Research shows that the mostly rural communities that suffer the negative health effects of fumigations have not benefited from the soy explosion. On the contrary, in most regions families have been pushed off land taken over by soy farming, leading to a loss of livelihood in addition to the severe health risks. According to a 2002 agricultural census, in four years more than 200,000 families were driven from their traditional farms, and most of the families relocated in working class belts outside of major cities.”

So on the one hand Monsanto claims to be on a philantrophic mission to "fight global hunger & poverty", and on the other it drives off poor subsistance farmers off their farmland to produce GM crops for livestock feed and for agrofuel production...?

Source: http://americas.irc-online.org/am/6254

Genetic contamination

Worse, GMO seeds will INEVITABLY and IRREVERSIBLY contaminate and destroy all traditional (non-GMO) seeds worldwide through genetic contamination. This is THE most serious economic, social, human and environmental threat and hazards that GMO’s pose to the future survival of human civilization. Over time all non-GMO seeds will be contaminated, sterilised and patented leaving the entire world exclusively and dangerously dependent on Monsanto and a handful of other biotech companies to buy their GM patented seeds, and thus...to eat & to live!

Terminator Technology
Worse yet, Monsanto’s macabre “Terminator Technology” will sterilise all contaminated seeds thereby making farmers and the entire world entirely and dangerously dependant on Monsanto and a handful of biotech companies to eat and thus to live...
As Dr. Mercola writes:

"Perhaps their biggest assault to your food supply is what’s known as Terminator Technology. These are seeds that have been genetically modified to “self-destruct.” In other words, the seeds (and the forthcoming crops) are sterile, which means farmers must buy them again each year.

The implications that terminator seeds could have on the world’s food supply are disastrous: the traits from genetically engineered crops can get passed on to other crops. Once the terminator seeds are released into a region, the trait of seed sterility could be passed to other non-genetically-engineered crops, making most or all of the seeds in the region sterile. If allowed to continue, every farmer in the world could come to rely on Monsanto for their seed supply!"
source: http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Politics/Politics/france_finds_monsanto_guilty_of_lying_211120090805.html

How does Monsanto plans to "feed the world" and to "fight global hunger & poverty" by killing the farmers and the soil and sterilising and patenting all traditional seeds..?

It becomes crystal clear from the above scientific and empirical evidence that the true objectives and agenda of Monsanto and the biotech industry are NOT to “feed the world…” and to " fight global hunger and poverty".

The root causes of poverty and hunger
Hunger - the worst form of violence - is a direct result of unfair global trading rules and exploitative economic practices and suicidal economic policies imposed on Africa by the IMF, the World Bank and the World Trade Organisation, blindly followed by so-called african "leaders" and governements which result in abject human poverty and hunger.

There is more than sufficient food to feed everyone in Africa and around the world. The problem lies in its inequitable distribution and in the lack of financial resources required to purchase it by the vast majority of the human population.
Thus, simply increasing food production without addressing the root economic, political and structural causes of poverty and hunger and without distributional justice will NOT resolve hunger poverty and hunger in Africa and in the world.
As Mahatma Gandhi rightly stated:

"There is enough food in the world to satisfy everyone's needs but not everyone's greed."

THE REAL (hidden) GEOPOLITICAL OBJECTIVES and AGENDA OF THE US ADMINISTRATION AND THE BIOTECH COMPANIES
CONTROL OIL AND YOU CONTROL NATIONS
CONTROL FOOD AND YOU CONTROL PEOPLE

Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State under Nixon ( and Nobel Peace Price laureate!)

Of course, the REAL (hidden) objectives and agenda of the US, Monsanto and the biotech industry are are NOT to "fight global hunger & poverty and feed the world"...

On the contrary...

Food used as a weapon

In fact, GMO’s are used as a “weapon” and a Trojan horse by the US and the biotech industry to serve their own economic & financial interests and achieve their (hidden) geopolitical agenda.

(Hidden) geopolitical objectives:

GMO's: Trojan Horse...

1) Total control over the supply of seeds/food worldwide

The first (hidden) geopolitical objective and agenda of the US and the biotech companies is to take total control over the global supply of seeds/food through the following mechanisms:

a)INEVITABLE & IRREVERSIBLE GENETIC CONTAMINATION of traditional seeds in Africa & worldwide

b)STERILISATION of contaminated seeds by using their macabre "Terminator Technology" which renders contaminated seeds sterile

c) PATENTING of contaminated and GMO seed - enforced through (so-called) "intellectual property" laws by the WTO.

2) Energy independence from oil

- Production of biofuels using patented GMO "food" crops on vast industrial plantations in Africa and other so-called " Third World" countries around the world.

In fact, GMO's will be used to produce agrofuels, industrial and pharmaceutical raw materials, livestock feed, etc. on vast seized tracks of land in Africa and in other so-called Third World countries for consumption in affluent countries and NOT food to " feed the hungry in Africa" or to " fight global hunger and poverty."

3) Eugenism and depopulation:
Total global control over the supply of seeds and thus of food will be used as a "weapon" for the massive reduction (genocide) of the world population and of so-called "inferior" races in so-called "overpopulated" Third World countries through famine...

4) Take over & total control over mineral and other natural resources in Africa & "overpopulated Third World" countries

This in turn, will enable the US to secure its geopolitical interests over minerals and other natural ressources in so-called "overpopulated" Third World countries around the world.

THUS, GMO's will lead to the largest GLOBAL FAMINE in the history of human civilisation and the GENOCIDE of both humanity and the planet...

*Pls read Henry Kissinger’s National Security Study Memo 200 NSSM 200 - the official (declassified) US government national policy which clearly outlines these geopolitical and genocidal objectives (blueprint for the genocide of the human population)

Also read the following excellent book and articles that clearly expose the (hidden) geopolitical & genocidal agenda of the US & the biotech companies:

Seeds of Destruction - The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, by F. William Engdahl, available at the following link: http://globalresearch.ca/books/SoD.html

In her review of Engdhal’s book, Arun Shrivastava writes:

“The central question that dominated the minds of the ruling clique was population reduction in resource rich countries but the question was how to engineer mass culling all over the world without generating powerful backlash as it was bound to happen. He traces how the field of Eugenics was renamed "genetics" to make it more acceptable and also to hide the real purpose.

When the US oil reserves peaked in 1972 and it became a net oil importer, the situation became alarming and the agenda took the centre stage. Kissinger, one of the key strategists of Nixon, nurtured by the Rockefellers, prepared what is known as National Security Study Memo (NSSM#200), in which he elaborated his plan for population reduction. In this Memo he specifically targets thirteen countries: Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Turkey, Thailand, and The Phillipines.

The weapon to be used was food; even if there was a famine food would be used to leverage population reduction. Kissinger is on record for stating, "Control oil, you control nations; control food and you control the people." How a small group of key people transformed the elitist philosophy, of controlling food to control people, into realistic operational possibility within a short time is the backdrop of Engdahl's book, the central theme running from the beginning till the end with the Rockefellers and Kissinger, among others, as the key dramatis personae.

Engdahl writes, "It was not surprising that the Pentagon's National Defense University, on the eve of the 2003 Iraq War, issued a paper declaring: 'Agribiz is to the United States what oil is to the Middle East.' Agribusiness had become a strategic weapon in the arsenal of the world's only superpower."

Engdahl provides hard evidences for these seeds of final destruction and utter decimation of world civilizations as we have known.”

The entire book review available at the following link:

Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation
Review of F. William Engdahl's book published by Global Research

by Arun Shrivastava

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9379

Moreover,Bill Gates, Rockfeller, Monsanto and the biotech companies are collecting and storing seeds from around the world in a giant underground seed vault they have built on an isolated island in the Arctic near the north pole...

To find out why, please read the following article by F. William Engdahl

"Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic:
Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529

It thus becomes crystal clear from all of the above scientific and empirical evidence that GMO’s will NOT "fight hunger and poverty in Africa" or "feed the world..." Rather, GMO's will lead to the greatest human, animal, economic, social and environmental GENOCIDE in the history of human civilization.
HOW TO AVOID THIS PLANNED & ORCHESTRATED GENOCIDE…?

“A chain is only as strong as its weakest link…”
What can we do individually & collectively to stop this GENOCIDE?

The solution is literally in your hands and in your wallet.

In fact, all we need to do is to stop purchasing and consuming foods that contains GMO’s. That includes almost all industrially processed foods, except for those that have a “GMO-FREE label on them. ( Not applicable in US because labeling of GMO foods is not required) (i.e. all products containing GM corn, soya, canola (oil, processed foods, etc.) GM fruits & vegetables, meat and other livestock fed with GM soya & corn and injected with GM growth hormones, dairy and other poultry produce such as milk, eggs, cheese, etc.

STOP buying & eating industrially processed foods

STOP buying & eating meat and other livestock - and their produce - which are all fed with GM soya and GM corn and injected with GM growth hormones.

STOP buying & eating GM & conventionally/industrially grown fruits & vegetables

BUY ONLY CERTIFIED ORGANIC FOOD DIRECTLY FROM LOCAL ORGANIC FARMERS IN YOUR AREA ( Build & support “Community Shared Agriculture” networks in your area)

GROW as much of your own food as possible, while you still "legally" can...( research Codex Alimentarius)

All we need to do individually and collectively is to stop purchasing and consuming GMO foods.

Then the whole system will collapse under its own weight...

PEACEFUL, NON-VIOLENT, NON-COOPERATION…

Truthfully,

Arya.

" In a time of universal deceit, telling the Truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE H1N1 VACCINE WHICH THE "FREE" PRESS WILL NEVER TELL YOU...

Open Letter to all Corporate Media Journalists

This is a translated version of a letter that, on the 11th of Ocotober 2009, was sent out to journalists working for the corporate media in Sweden and has since then been widely distributed among a very rapidly growing grassroot anti-vaccine/anti NWO movement in Sweden.

Feel free to use this letter as a template for an open letter that can be sent out to journalists and distributed among people in your country as well. The revolution will be global.

The direct link to this letter is: http://www.wordmworld.net/uncategorized/open-letter-journalists

To all journalists working in Sweden: The truth is out. Your employers have been revealed. Your employers employers have been revealed. Your employers employers employer has been revealed. The truth is out. I repeat: The truth is out.

The biggest crime against humanity in modern time is taking place right in front of our eyes - and you, all swedish journalists, are quiet. I repeat: The biggest crime against humanity in modern time is right now taking place in front of our eyes - and you are quiet.

To all journalists working in Sweden: with this letter I want to tell you that you have a choice. Either you immediately, and I do mean immediately, start reporting what is really going on in this country and all over the world - or else, as of today, you will be regarded as accomplices in this close to unimaginably horrendous criminal act against the people of Sweden and against the people of the entire planet.

I repeat: To all journalists working in Sweden, either you immediately start reporting what is actually going on in the world, or else you are considered enemies to the people of Sweden.

Passivity is no longer an option. Silence is no longer an option. Propaganda is no longer an option. Disinformation is no longer an option. As of today, wednesday, the 11th October 2009, you will start to write, tell and show us the truth.

Your employers, the corporate media in Sweden and around the world, are right now under the control of the most evil international crime syndicate that has ever existed. We know that they have siezed your base of operation.

Aftonbladet, Expressen, Svenska Dagbladet, Dagens Nyheter, Metro, The Swedish Radio, The Swedish Television, TV4, and all you other lackeys of evil - we know that right now, you are all being used as the central unit of propaganda, in Sweden, for the most cynical conspiracy that humanity has ever seen.

We know that this conspiracy stretches all the way from Wall Street, to the White House, to the World “Health” Organization, to the UN, to the European Union, to the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies, to the upcoming meeting in Copenhagen, to media moguls, to the world’s leading bankers, to top politicians, to the swedish government, to swedish banking, to the swedish press, to the swedish drug agency, and to corresponding institutions all across the world.

I understand if this sounds unpleasant, but this is nothing compared to how unpleasant things will become if we all don’t take this absolutely seriously. Right now. Today. Absolutely seriously. This is nothing to smile about. Nothing to dismiss. Nothing to ignore. The crime that is right now taking place in front of our eyes is a part of the most hideous, and sophisticated, conspiracy that can - unless you and we take immediate action - bring more pain and suffering to both us and coming generations than we ever could have imagined.

In the case you choose to call this crazy conspiracy theories without even informing yourselves about what is actually going on in the world: stop this nonsense right away.

The truth is out. We know what is going on. The majority of the people in Sweden and around the world are not aware of the things that are taking place, but there are enough people who are aware for me to, once again, repeat this ultimatum: Starting today, the 11th of November 2009, you will start working with conveying the truth about the swine flu, the vaccine and the ongoing mass vaccinations to all people in Sweden.

If you refuse to meet this demand, then I, and all others who are aware of what is going on, and all of those that within a near future will start to understand, will - for the rest of your careers, for the rest of your lives - hold you responsible for just standing on the side and doing nothing but observe, while this disgusting crime was taking place.

All of you swedish journalists, it is your job to scrutinize those in power. It is your job to report to us when they abuse their power. It is your job to inform the swedish people about current events. Right now, you are not doing your job. This will result in fatal consequences, unless you immediately start doing what you are supposed to do and what you have to do.

Even though I do hope that you come to your senses, it is not something that I neither expect nor rely on. For this reason, I’ve started the page “VaccinationNews“. This news reporting is not as fancy as the thug papers for which you work, but it deals with something that the swedish people need more than anything else right now - the truth about the swine flu, the vaccine and the mass vaccinations. The link to this daily news reporting about the swine flu, the vaccine and the mass vaccinations is: http://www.wordmworld.net/bubble-words/vaccinationsnyheterna (in swedish)

In case you journalists want to write real articles but have them refused by your scoundrel employers, then you are very welcome to send them to the “VaccinationNews”, and I will publish them on this site.

The same goes for the Swedish people. The most dangerous thing we can do right now is wait for someone else to take action. We have to start taking matters in our hands. You have to take matters in your own hands.

Right now, we dispose over a fantastic means of communication, the Internet. We have to start take advantage of this. Thanks to the Internet, we can communicate with each other directly, by sending links, video clips, documents and articles. It is very important that we do not take our current communicative freedoms for granted. It is equally important that we spread this information that governments, mainstream media and all those in power want to keep away from us, as much as possible and as quickly as possible.

Communicate with the people around you, both in everyday life and on the Internet. Talk to each other, discuss, ask questions, think critically, exchange ideas, send links, post information on facebook, twitter, blogs, in different forums, and spread the word that our future is right now at stake and do it in every way possible.

For every day that passes, our freedoms are being taken away from us, both on the web and in our communities, without most of us even noticing it. If we want to come out of this fight victoriously, then we need to exercise our rights and use all our means of communication to the fullest. Now, right now, right away.

———————————————————————————

This is a translated version of a letter that, on the 11th of Ocotober 2009, was sent out to journalists working for the corporate media in Sweden and has since then been widely distributed among a very rapidly growing grassroot anti-vaccine/anti NWO movement in Sweden. Feel free to use this letter as a template for an open letter that can be sent out to journalists in your country as well.

Also, if you speak other foreign languages, please feel free to make further translations. Right now, most “real” news about the swine flu conspiracy are in english. This is a great language, but there are still a large number of people in the world that don’t speak english. We need to make all of the information out there available in as many languages as possible.

If you make a translation, you can send this to me and I’ll post it here on this website, where I’ve put together plenty of information regarding all of this.

The direct link to this letter is: http://www.wordmworld.net/uncategorized/open-letter-journalists

———————————————————————————


Unfortunately, I believe many of you, both journalists and citizens of Sweden, have still not grasped how serious this situation is. Let me speak clearly: Our lives are at stake. Our childrens lives are at stake. Our grandchildrens lives are at stake.

If you have ever wondered how it could happen that Hitler, about seventy years ago, could come to power and terrorize the entire world for a decade without noone stopping him, then you don’t have to study any history books, all you need is take a look around you, right now, in your own life, in the world today. This is how it happened. This is how it happens.

One of the big questions of this century is whether humanity has learned the lesson from the mistakes that were committed back then, in the middle of the last century, or whether this time as well, we will stand paralyzed, blind for the truth, ignorant, obeying authorities, intellectually and emotionally hypnotized, while the most powerful people on the planet will control humanity as they please, steer us into depravity, as were we a herd of stupid, little sheep?

This is what these people think of us, as sheep. As fools. As slaves. It is up to us if want to accept this, because that is what we have been doing for hundreds of years, or whether we finally, once and for all, will realize what a superb creature each and every one of us in fact is, and then take away both the power positions, means of power and resources from these utterly few but incredibly evil people. I believe the time has come for this. I hope so. I know so.

If you journalists only dare to not start reporting what is going on the world, then we, the people of Sweden, will hold you responsible for indirectly having worked against this and thus contributed to an imeasurable amount of suffering for our friends, our sisters and brothers, our families, our children, our grandchildren, and also for yourselves. Don’t be mistaken; right now, when you are reading this, is the time when you have to make a decision.

The truth is out. This whole story will come to daylight. Believe nothing else. If you think you can get away with your silence, then you are wrong. If you think that you will be able to blame someone else, then you are wrong. If you believe that you are powerless, then you are wrong. You have to start doing your job.

Before I continue, I would like to give the following message to some of your employers and executives: Jan Helin (Editor in Chief, Aftonbladet), Raol Grüntahl (CEO, Schibsted), Thomas Mattson (Editor in Chief, Expressen), Jonas Bonnier (CEO, Bonnier), Thorbjörn Larsson (Editor in Chief, Dagens Nyheter), Lena K. Samuelsson (Editor in Chief, Svenska Dagbladet), Mats Svegfors (CEO, the Swedish Radio), Eva Hamilton (CEO, the Swedish Television, Jan Scherman (CEO, the TV4-group): we know that you pitiful, pathetic scumbags are lapdogs for the international crime syndicate that is right now attempting to posion the whole population of Sweden. We know that you run errands for these, the most loathsome crooks that the planet has ever seen, by reporting everything that they want you to report, telling us everything that they want you to tell us, showing us everything that they want you to show us.

If I say the words “Marie Antoinette”, “Ludwig the XVI”, “1793″, “guillotine” - then what are the images popping up in your tiny, corrupt brains? If anyone of you put up a single more misleading placard about the vaccine against the swine flu, if anyone of you show a single more lying news report about the ongoing mass vaccinations, if anyone of you keep on avoiding to give the swedish people all the information that governments and rulers around the world are intentionally keeping away from the citizens, if anyone one of you keep feeding us with the illusion that everything is okey and there is nothing to worry about, if any of you, starting today, the 11th of October 2009, keep on lying to the swedish people, deceiving the swedish people, give disinformation to the swedish people, spread distraction to the swedish people, then you will have to pay very dearly for this.

To all of us, I want you to answer us the following two questions:

1) Where are your loyalties - with the people of Sweden or with the most insidious criminals on the entire planet?
2) From whom do you take your orders?

Now back to the swedish journalists. I suspect that many of you, since a long time back, have realized that there is something fishy going on. I suspect that many of you, since a long time back, are functioning as tools for the propaganda machines that are called Aftonbladet, Expressen, Svenska Dagbladet, Dagens Nyheter, Swedish Radio, Swedish Televison, and other devices for intense mass indoctrination of the people of Sweden.

I suspect, as well, that many of you have already started digging into this whole thing and possibly even, to a certain extent, have engaged in some sort of journalistic work. But for some reason, all of you are quiet. I suspect that you have been forced to not write about these matters. I suspect that you are afraid of getting sacked if you start doing what you are supposed to do. I even suspect that some of you have been threatened. I regret this. But if you believe that this an acceptable excuse for your silence, then you are wrong.

If you do not break this silence immediately, then you will - when all of this is brought to dayligt, which it soon will be - from the entire population of Sweden, receive such an avalanche of fury that whatever it is that is right now frightening you will appear as a drop in the ocean in comparison.

The fact that you call yourselves journalists is a disgrace without equal. Right now, you are nothing more than servile writing whores, prostituting your pens and intellects to these cynical-beyond-belief people who crashed an entire world economy, who put the puppet Barack Obama in the White House and made sure he received the Nobel Peace Prize while his politics are raping the entire planet, who made sure this con-artist and his criminal cronies performed the greatest robbery of all time by robbing the american tax payers of hundreds of billions of dollars when they handed out the so called “stimulus packages” to the same banking crooks that staged the whole crash of the economy from the beginning, who made sure that all allied governments around the world did the same thing (including the swedish traitors), who - in an austrian laboratory - mutated virus strains from bird flu, swine flu and human flu and by doing this created the virus called A(H1N1), who far in advance had created the vaccine which they then claim “protects” against the genetically manufactured A(H1N1) virus, who released the virus on the planet’s population, who fabricated the lie that the completely new and “unknown” virus had emerged among mexican swines, who fabricated the lie that the so called “swine flu”, which is the result of this virus, is a lethal threat to humanity, who fabricated the lie that we are facing a full scale pandemic, who made sure that the World Health Organization - which is in their control - on completely ridiculous grounds raised the pandemic level to phase 6 so that, in the almost 200 countries that follow the decisions of WHO, mass vaccinations could begin without any safety control of the vaccine whatsoever, which will then be followed - and this is where we are now - by applying martial law in all of the world’s countries so that the entire population of the planet will be facing forced vaccinations, followed by another injection with the purpose of targeting the human being’s immune system and by doing so - a three-step attack with this biological weapon - carry out an international genocide, whereupon the architects of the whole thing would be able to bring in a global, fascist, totalitarian dictatorship using the UN - which is in their control - as a central base of power for a new world government, and since both the mass vaccination murders and the “financial crisis” robbery would to such a great have weakened the people of the world, we would not be able to revolt, and by doing all of this, these criminal masterminds will be able to keep and strengthen their own positions of power and at the same time consolidating the positions of the misled masses as their ignorant slaves.

The truth is out. This is their plan. And you, all swedish journalists, are quiet.

Fortunately, there is still such a thing in this world as real journalists. One of those is called Jane Bürgermeister and she was the one who first presented the evidence of the mindblowingly evil crime that is currently developing both here in Sweden and all over the world. All the information is available for everyone, including you. And yet, you are quiet. The evidence have been confirmed and confirmed again and confirmed yet again.

For every day that passes, this conspiratory plan is progressing, and for every day that passes, the fight to keep it from succeeding is also progressing - and you, all journalists working in Sweden, are quiet.

You should be ashamed of yourselves. How can you look your children in their eyes? How can you look yourselves in the mirror? The level of integrity that all journalists in Sweden have shown for the past year is so terribly low that you, whose job it is to scrutinize those in power, are not worth more than stinking rats.

If you dismiss all of this as conspiratory nonsense without even trying to dig into the case, then you are turning yourselves into the enemies of the swedish people. It is your job to search for this information, look at it, investigate it, question it, but if you’re not even touching it, if you’re not even telling about it, if you don’t even dare facing it, then you are nothing more than rotten henchmen for the incredibly small gang of super criminals that for centuries have tortured humanity and for centuries to come aim to keep on doing so.

In order to take part of the most essential information about all of this, you can read Jane Bürgermeisters summary of this criminal case by clicking on the following link:
http://www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=355&Itemid=56&lang=en

In case you think all of this just sounds to unbelievable to be true, which is understandable (but at the same time, it is not a rational way of confronting the claims) then you can start to look through the evidence.

For example, you can read a two-part memorandum from WHO, which was written in 1972, about how to - in three steps - turn a vaccine into a deadly weapon: first by weakening the immune system, secondly by injecting a large dose of virus into the body which the weakened immune system can’t cope with, and thirdly by injecting an adjuvant that triggers a massive inflammatory reaction and a so called cytokine storm.

This memorandum can be read here:
http://theflucase.com/downloads/WHO_Memo_1_searchable.pdf
and here: http://theflucase.com/downloads/WHO_Memo_2_Searchable.pdf

To continue, you can have a look at patent application for the vaccine against “swine flu” that the pharmaceutical Baxter filed before the “completely unknown” swine flu virus “suddenly” appeared in Mexiko. http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/documents/vaccines/Baxter%20Vaccine%20Patent%20Application.pdf

Baxter is also the same company that, in an austrian laboratory, created the “swine flu” virus and in february earlier this year sent 72 kg of falsely labeled contaminated vaccine material to laboratories around the world in order to spread the virus. The evidence for this, and much else, can be read in Bürgermeister’s 134 page document where she has put together substantial evidence that the swine flu, the vaccine and the mass vaccinations are part of an extremely complex plan to carry out genocide.

The defendants are (among others): Barack Obama (President, USA), David Nabarro (Coordinator of Influenza, UN), Margaret Chan (Director-General, WHO), Robert Parkinson (CEO, Baxter International), Daniel Vassella (CEO, Novartis International), Andrew Witty (CEO, GlaxoSmithKline), George W. Bush (Former President, USA), Bill Gates (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), Kathleen Sibelius (Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services), Janet Napolitano (Secretary of Department of Homeland Security), David de Rothschild (Banker), David Rockefeller (Banker), George Soros (Banker) and Alois Stöger (Health Minister, Austria). This document is found here: http://theflucase.com/downloads/Evidence_of_the_use_of_pandemic_flu_to_depopulate_USA.pdf

Worth reading are also the charges that have been filed with the FBI. The indicted are (among others): WHO, UN and the pharmaceutical companies Baxter och Novartis. You can read this document here: http://theflucase.com/downloads/Criminal_Charges_FBI-US.pdf

If you would like to approach the case from another angle, I’ve put together a list with more than 75 links to various videos, sound recordings, news articles and important documents concerning all of this. All of this information is, in other words, available just with a few clicks on your mouse, and is found here:
http://www.wordmworld.net/bubble-words/the-information-war-mainstream-media-vs-truth

On this page you will find, among many other things, the following documentary about a swine flu virus, a vaccine, a corporate media propaganda campaign and a massive coverup. This might perhaps sound familiar to what is now going on - and yes, it is very familiar, except for the fact that it took place in 1976 and was a trial run for what would come later on, and what has now come.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_9I1L_P370

You can also, for example, listen to a sound recording from the incredibly influential, and for many people unknown, Council on Foreign Relations - which operates closely to the american government, where they discuss how mainstream media should create a false image of scarcity in order to drive up demand. A tactic that has been applied by corporate media both in Sweden, Germany, the United States and many other parts of the world. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsKsgHbxuc0

Or, you can listen to something so unusual as an uncorrupted health minister’s opinion on the swine flu and the vaccine, namely Ewa Kopacz from Poland. Where are you social minister Göran Hägglund? Where are you health minister Maria Larsson? Why are you so quiet, you rotten flies who call yourselves leaders of the swedish people? From whom do you take your orders? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlqWFV098xw

Where are you, prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt? We know that you know what is going on. We know that you are a pathetic little puppet for the Bilderberg gang.

Where are you, foreign minister and previous prime minister Carl Bildt? We know that you are one of the most evil people that has ever walked on swedish ground and the puppet master in swedish politics.

Here is a message to all of you, and to all others that this concern - you know who you are (finance minister Anders Borg and education minister Jan Björklund, for example): your days are counted. You are finished. Finito. Farewell.

And to all you other cowards who call yourselves politicians, no matter the party to which you belong - all the way from the social democrats to the lefties to the green party to the liberals to the christian democrats to the conservatives to the center party, you are going down. Not any single one of you has had the courage to stand up and tell the truth to the swedish people, and that is why you are finished. The time has come when the swedish people will realize that you are nothing but morons, wimps, confused little clowns that get a kick out of controlling other people.

Back to you journalists. You can also read an article about a certain Joseph Moshe, a microbiologist at MOSSAD, who in a desperate attempt to convey the truth called a radio show and said that a virus was being created in a Baxter laboratory in the Ukraine, which would be used as biological weapon. Shortly thereafter, the american security service arrested him, saying that he had threatened to bomb the White House. Since then, no one has heard from him. You can read about this here: http://www.unfictional.com/joseph-moshe-mossad-bioweapon-swine-flu-vaccine-westwood

And keeping the situation that is currently evolving in the Ukraine in mind, which the swedish media completely ignores, the Moshe case should be particularly interesting.
http://www.infowars.com/reported-cases-of-mystery-flu-in-ukraine-double-in-two-days/

Jane Bürgermeisters own homepage, which is invaluable, is found here: http://www.theflucase.com

And to understand what the connections is between this and the current financial crisis, as well as understanding who the true Barack Obama is (which is the most dangerous woolf in sheep’s clothing and the most skilled deciever that the world has ever seen) you can watch the film “Fall of the Republic”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU

To understand how the banking complex is involved in the financial crisis, then a startpoint can be this very well written article about how the investment bank Goldman Sachs, which is under the control of the same people that control the White House, WHO, UN, EU, news agencies suchs as Reuters and Associated Press, banks such as JP Morgan and Rothschild Bank, the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England, the pharmaceutical companies Baxter, Novartis and many more of the world’s most powerful institutions in everything from politics, business, pharmaceuticals, mainstream media, banking, entertainment and so on, knew in advance about the crashing economy: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/77791.html

If you have a hard time seeing the complete picture of the situation, then you can read a thourough explanation of how the responsible crime syndicate, which is called The Illuminati, operates by reading the article “Flu is not the biggest danger - it’s the vaccine!”, written by David Icke: http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/25191

Surely, all of this might for some of you still seem very confusing, and I understand that. The lies that we have been fed with are so massive and have been going on for so long and are so sophisticated and skillfully covered up, that anyone is at risk of getting lost. But we cannot allow ourselves to get lost. We have been lost for far too long.

Now is the time that the swedish people will start to understand where the real power structures are that have been dictating the evolution of humanity for centuries and to understand the forces that have planned the atrocities currently taking place, and have been taking place for longer than I think most people believe is possible.

But it is possible. We shall always remember how amazingly cynical these people are, how strong their contempt of life is and how - in an evil way - incredibly brilliant they are. Now it is your job, all swedish journalists, to start tell the swedish people about all of this. Immediately. We will not tolerate one more day of propaganda or screaming silence. The choice is yours. You know the deal.

If you want information to work with, if you want a few pieces of the puzzle, if you want to start examining the real rulers of the world, if you want to convey the truth to the swedish people, then I believe you will be able to dig deeper with the help of a collection of key words and links that I have posted here below.

The truth is out. Will you remain silent?

Evil want this information to be kept away from us.
Love demands this information to be brought forward.

/Mikis Mazarakis

The direct link to this letter is: http://www.wordmworld.net/uncategorized/open-letter-journalists
The link to a public database for backup copies of valuable information: http://www.wordmworld.net/uncategorized/public-backup



INFORMATION THAT THEY WANT TO KEEP AWAY FROM US:


1. History of World Banking
For example: http://www.fourwinds10.com/resources/uploads/pdf/the_brief.pdf

2. The Rothschilds
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F4IGwuKdUQ

3. The Rothschilds, World Central Banks
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uG4y1xg0kSQ&feature=related

4. The Rockefellers
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUNoFodlIOY

5. Rothschild, Rockefeller, Federal Reserve
T ex: http://www.land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml

6. Goldman Sachs
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCWN4M5RkQI

7. Goldman Sachs, Federal Reserve, Timothy Geithner, Lawrence Summers
For example: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12953

8. Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, above the law
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol3mEe8TH7w

9. Zbigniew Brezinski, “The Grand Chessboard”
For example: http://sandiego.indymedia.org/media/2006/10/119973.pdf

10. Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Trilateral Comission
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKq_rpFPidw

11. Zbigniew Brezinski, Columbia University, Barack Obama
For example: http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/18281

12. House of Windsor, Battenberg, Queen Elizabeth, Nazi Roots
For example: http://abundanthope.net/pages/article_3812.shtml

13. Rockefeller, The Bilderberg Group
For example: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=7781

14. Cecil Rhodes, Africa, Round Table, Rothschild
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iRHbBiHuuA

15. Rothschild, Cecil Rhodes
For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Rhodes

16. Rothschild, Rockefeller, Round Table
For example: http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/round-table

17. Bush, Hitler, Nazi
For example: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar

18. Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Rockefeller, Al Gore, Warren Buffet, George Soros
For example: http://www.oldthinkernews.com/Articles/oldthinker%20news/elites_launch_global_impact.htm

19. George Soros
For example: http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2832_soros.html

20. George Soros, Sweden, financial crisis, 1992
For example: http://wwwc.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/9806/12/soros.html

21. George Soros, Carl Bildt (Foreign minister, former Prime Minister of Sweden), central bank reserve, 1992
For example: http://www.internetional.se/fischerpolt.htm

22. Carl Bildt, Bilderberg, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Trilateral Comission
For example: http://www.eaec.org/svenska/carl_Bildt_vargen_i_f%C3%A5rhuset.htm

23. Bilderberg, Athens, May 2009, Carl Bildt, Jan Björklund, Timothy Geithner, Rockefeller
For example: http://www.nyapolitiken.biz/bilderberg/bilderberg-agenda-avslojad.html

24. Bilderberg, Ottawa 2006, Carl Bildt, Wallenberg, Fredrik Reinfeldt (Prime Minister of Sweden)
For example: http://www.svd.se/naringsliv/nyheter/artikel_3787597.svd

25. Bilderberg, G20, Timothy Geithner, Ben Bernanke, Anders Borg (Finance Minister of Sweden)
For example: http://www.bilderbergbook.com

26. Bilderberg, Athens, May 2009, Carl Bildt, Jan Björklund (Head of Liberal Party), Jacob Wallenberg, Paul Wolfowitz, Queen Beatrix, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Lawrence Summers, Daniel Vasella
For example: http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-2009-attendee-list/

27. Daniel Vasella, Novartis, Swine Flu, Vaccine
T ex: http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/novartis-recalls-h1n1-vaccine-two-months-before-h1n1-outbreak-in-mexico/

28. Swine Flu, Vaccine, Daniel Vasella, Novartis, George Soros, Barack Obama, George Bush, Rockefeller, de Rothschild, Bioterrorism evidence, criminal charges
For example: http://theflucase.com/downloads/Evidence_of_the_use_of_pandemic_flu_to_depopulate_USA.pdf

29. Queen Elizabeth, Queen Beatrix, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Bush, Barack Obama, Clinton, Illuminati, New World Order
For example: http://www.wordmworld.net/bubble-words/benjamin-fulford

30. Rothschild, Rockefeller, Illuminati, Freemasonry, New World Order
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLzRlLS4V-w

31. New World Order, George Bush
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12RJo

32. New World Order, Barack Obama
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iotc10SGzxY

33. New World Order, Henry Kissinger
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD3BqK-9ZiU

34. New World Order, Gordon Brown
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbFcaQpqqt4

35. Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, George Bush, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, New World Order, Al Gore
For example: http://www.truthandliberty.com/New_World_Order.html

36. Al Gore, Global Warming scam, 31000 scientists
For example: http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/al_gore_global_warming/2008/05/19/97307.html

37. Al Gore, Global Warming scam, Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner, Lawrence Summers, Goldman Sachs, New World Order, Copenhagen
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU

38. John F. Kennedy, secret societies, assasination
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnkdfFAqsHA

39. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Trilateral Comission, Council on Foreign Relations, War on Terror
For example: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15686

40. Trilateral Comission, European Council on Foreign Relations, Urban Ahlin (Swedish congressman), Socialdemocratic Party
For example: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_Ahlin

41. Göran Persson (former Prime Minister), Leif Pagrotsky (former Finance Minister), the Wallenberg family, Investor, Bilderberg
For example: http://www.dn.se/nyheter/de-rikas-hemliga-motesplats-1.596647

42. Bilderberg, Henry Kissinger, Queen Beatrix, Carl Bildt
For example: http://www.bilderberg.org/2000pics.htm

43. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Council on Foreign Relations, Al-Qaeda
For example: http://www.takeoverworld.info/brzezinski_note.html

44. Al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, Tim Osman, CIA
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-v34Lf0g6U

45. Osama bin Laden, Tim Osman, Zbigniew Brzezinski
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJTv2nFjMBk

46. Al Qaeda, 9/11, inside job
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM

47. Osama Bin Laden, Benazir Bhutto, assasination
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1uLdmct8_E

48. Osama Bin Laden, audio tapes, fabricated intelligence
For example: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=3009

49. Barack Obama, Zbigniew Brzezinski, New World Order, Goldman Sachs, George Soros
For example: http://www.scribd.com/doc/13607099/Webster-Griffin-Tarpley-Barack-H-Obama-the-Unauthorized-Biography

50. Rockefeller, Rothschild, World War 1, World War 2, EU, UN, Bilderberg group, New World Order
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-CrNlilZho&feature=player_embedded